Patent Remedies: Recommendations for International Best Practices

10 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2016

See all articles by Thomas F. Cotter

Thomas F. Cotter

University of Minnesota Law School

Date Written: November 28, 2016

Abstract

This paper provides the text of a lecture I presented at Doshisha University in Kyoto, Japan in June 2015 on patent remedies. In the lecture, I present a set of “best practices” intended to better align the enforcement of patent rights with what the theoretical and empirical analysis of these rights suggests would be optimal. Among the topics I touch upon are the conditions under which injunctions must or should be granted; the forms of monetary relief the should be available; the principles that should guide the calculation of monetary relief; and the circumstances, if any, under which should nations award enhanced damages, attorneys’ fees, and interest. I argue that, at the end of the day, there will still be a good deal of healthy diversity among jurisdictions with regard to these issues. But if we can reach tentative agreement that certain practices are indefensible, or at least questionable, from an economic perspective — or even if we only can narrow the range of defensible options — we would have a set of global enforcement practices that might better serve the public interest.

Keywords: Patents, damages, injunctions, royalties, enhanced damages, attorneys' fees, restitution

Suggested Citation

Cotter, Thomas F., Patent Remedies: Recommendations for International Best Practices (November 28, 2016). Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16-40, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2876874 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2876874

Thomas F. Cotter (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota Law School ( email )

229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-7527 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Abstract Views
672
Rank
527,956
PlumX Metrics