Externalities in the Fragmented Metropolis: Local Institutional Choices and the Efficiency-Equity Tradeoff

American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 46(3), p. 314-36, 2016

40 Pages Posted: 16 Dec 2016

See all articles by Benedict S. Jimenez

Benedict S. Jimenez

Georgia State University - Andrew Young School of Policy Studies

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

A highly fragmented system of local governance represents a market-like arrangement in which competition among service providers benefits citizen-consumers by improving the efficiency of local public service delivery. Yet, the local public market can also fail, producing negative outcomes for some communities and their residents. Because fragmentation can have differential impacts on the welfare of different groups of citizens — benefiting others and harming some — the organization of the local public sector raises important equity questions. This research focuses on the negative outcomes or externalities generated by local government fragmentation, specifically urban sprawl and spatial economic segregation. The results of the empirical analysis suggest that the design of the local public sector structure involves a tradeoff between efficiency and equity.

Keywords: Government Fragmentation, Externalities, Urban Sprawl, Economic Segregation

JEL Classification: H70

Suggested Citation

Jimenez, Benedict Salazar, Externalities in the Fragmented Metropolis: Local Institutional Choices and the Efficiency-Equity Tradeoff (2016). American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 46(3), p. 314-36, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2885695

Benedict Salazar Jimenez (Contact Author)

Georgia State University - Andrew Young School of Policy Studies ( email )

Atlanta, GA
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
34
Abstract Views
307
PlumX Metrics