The European Commission's Interpretative Guidance and National Courts

21 Pages Posted: 9 Jan 2017

See all articles by Kathryn Wright

Kathryn Wright

University of York - York Law School

Date Written: September 29, 2016

Abstract

Given the extent of soft law and interpretative guidance by bodies which are not courts, there is a need for further insight into interinstitutional communication between the EU and national levels. This contribution focuses upon the ‘diagonal’ relationship between the European Commission and national courts. It explores the impact of the Commission’s ostensibly non-binding interpretative guidance on national judicial decision-making. Applying the concepts of active and passive interpretation of EU law by the Commission to cases in national courts, it examines the relative interpretative roles of the Commission and the Court of Justice, and finds examples of both being employed. Through active interpretation it can be argued that the Commission oversteps its competence. However, the Commission also uses its role to ‘bootstrap’ the Court of Justice’s case law and further encourage compliance. The significance of soft law is viewed both from the ‘supply side’ of the European Commission, revealing its representation of the EU interest in context, and the ‘demand side’ of national courts as recipients.

Keywords: European Commission, CJEU, National Courts, Soft Law, Legal Interpretation, EU Interest

JEL Classification: K39

Suggested Citation

Wright, Kathryn, The European Commission's Interpretative Guidance and National Courts (September 29, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2895043 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2895043

Kathryn Wright (Contact Author)

University of York - York Law School ( email )

University of York
Heslington, York YO10
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
543
Rank
555,299
PlumX Metrics