Industrial Investments in Energy Efficiency: A Good Idea?

48 Pages Posted: 11 Jan 2017

See all articles by Mary Li

Mary Li

University of Chicago - Department of Economics

Date Written: January 01, 2017

Abstract

Yes, from an energy-saving perspective. No, once we factor in the negative output and productivity adoption effects. These are the main conclusions we reach by conducting the first large-scale study on cogeneration technology adoption – a prominent form of energy-saving investments – in the U.S. manufacturing sector, using a sample that runs from 1982 to 2010 and drawing on multiple data sources from the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Energy Information Administration. We first show through a series of event studies that no differential trends exist in energy consumption nor production activities between adopters and never-adopters prior to the adoption event. We then compute a distribution of realized returns to energy savings, using accounting methods and regression methods, based on our difference-in-difference estimator. We find that (1) significant heterogeneity exists in returns; (2) unlike previous studies in the residential sector, the realized and projected returns to energy savings are roughly consistent in the industrial sector, for both private and social returns; (3) however, cogeneration adoption decreases manufacturing output and productivity persistently for at least the next 7-10 years, relative to the control group. Our IV strategies also show sizable decline in TFP post adoption.

Suggested Citation

Li, Mary, Industrial Investments in Energy Efficiency: A Good Idea? (January 01, 2017). US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-17-05, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2897003 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2897003

Mary Li (Contact Author)

University of Chicago - Department of Economics ( email )

1126 E. 59th St
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
63
Abstract Views
664
Rank
632,749
PlumX Metrics