Managing the Inter-Cultural Dimensions of a Mediation Effectively – A Proposed Pre-Mediation Intake Instrument

(2017) 28 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 89

Singapore Management University School of Law Research Paper No. 7/2017

13 Pages Posted: 7 Feb 2017 Last revised: 6 Sep 2017

See all articles by Dorcas Quek Anderson

Dorcas Quek Anderson

Singapore Management University - Yong Pung How School of Law; Singapore Management University - Centre for AI & Data Governance

Diana Knight

ACT Human Rights Commission

Date Written: October 30, 2016

Abstract

Being a culturally responsive mediator has become increasingly challenging amidst the growing cultural complexity within many societies. Drawing on the existing research on culture and the authors’ experiences of mediating disputes amongst diverse disputants in Australia and Singapore, this paper proposes an emic-constructivist approach for the mediator to understand the individual disputant’s unique cultural preferences. It also recommends bringing forward the exercise of understanding cultural preferences through conducting pre-mediation intake interviews. It is argued that this approach enables the mediator to embrace the parties’ cultural complexity and to design the mediation process based on their rich milieu of preferences. Finally, the paper puts forward a framework for the pre-mediation intake instrument.

Keywords: pre-mediation intake, culture, mediation, emic, constructivist

Suggested Citation

Quek Anderson, Dorcas and Knight, Diana, Managing the Inter-Cultural Dimensions of a Mediation Effectively – A Proposed Pre-Mediation Intake Instrument (October 30, 2016). (2017) 28 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 89, Singapore Management University School of Law Research Paper No. 7/2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2909477

Dorcas Quek Anderson (Contact Author)

Singapore Management University - Yong Pung How School of Law ( email )

55 Armenian Street
Singapore, 179943
Singapore

Singapore Management University - Centre for AI & Data Governance ( email )

55 Armenian Street
Singapore
Singapore

Diana Knight

ACT Human Rights Commission ( email )

GPO Box 158
Canberra, 2601
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
147
Abstract Views
680
Rank
361,495
PlumX Metrics