Rethinking Duress

Jurisprudence Vol. 7, Iss. 3, 2016

Posted: 3 May 2018

See all articles by Dennis Patterson

Dennis Patterson

Rutgers University School of Law, Camden; University of Surrey - School of Law

Date Written: December 1, 2016

Abstract

John Hyman makes a good case for the proposition that duress defeases what would otherwise be a voluntary act. In this article, I consider Hyman's arguments in the context of economic duress and conclude that while Hyman makes an excellent case for the proposition that duress vitiates voluntariness, there may be cases where the law might not want to allow the defence of duress.

Keywords: jurisprudence, duress, voluntariness, consent, choice

Suggested Citation

Patterson, Dennis, Rethinking Duress (December 1, 2016). Jurisprudence Vol. 7, Iss. 3, 2016 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2910858

Dennis Patterson (Contact Author)

Rutgers University School of Law, Camden ( email )

Camden, NJ 08102-1203
United States
856-225-6369 (Phone)
856-751-8752 (Fax)

University of Surrey - School of Law ( email )

United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
436
PlumX Metrics