Sovereign Wealth Fund Investments in Europe as an Instrument of Chinese Energy Policy

Posted: 16 Feb 2017

See all articles by Tomasz Kaminski

Tomasz Kaminski

University of Lodz - Faculty of International and Political Studies

Date Written: February 15, 2017

Abstract

Chinese Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are new and even more important instruments of Chinese ‘Go Global’ strategy and the politics of maintaining raw materials and energy security. Europe has lured 60% of the total USD 27.3 billion invested by Chinese SWFs in the energy sector globally, which provokes the question as to how important SWF investments are in the political sense and what security concerns they bring. This paper is the first that presents a comprehensive picture of Chinese SWF investments in the European energy market and one of the very few papers about SWFs based on multiannual, comprehensive empirical data. The author argues that Chinese SWFs are different players on the energy market than private investors, could be potentially harmful for some European interests. By installing representatives on the company boards, China gains access to sensitive information that could be then transferred to Chinese competitors. Moreover, through its SWFs China could take control over energy companies or critical infrastructure and increase its political influence in European countries, making them more vulnerable to political pressure. Therefore, the European policy-makers should consider taking special steps to monitor and maybe limit Chinese SWFs expansion in the energy sector.

Keywords: Sovereign Wealth Funds, Chinese investments, Chinese energy policy

JEL Classification: F5

Suggested Citation

Kaminski, Tomasz, Sovereign Wealth Fund Investments in Europe as an Instrument of Chinese Energy Policy (February 15, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2918555

Tomasz Kaminski (Contact Author)

University of Lodz - Faculty of International and Political Studies ( email )

Ulica Prezydenta Gabriela
Narutowicza 65 str.
Lodz, 90-131
Poland

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
334
PlumX Metrics