Tech Neutrality in Australian Signature Law

(2016) 24 Journal of Law, Information and Science 101

Griffith University Law School Research Paper No. 17-10

20 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2017

See all articles by Dane Weber

Dane Weber

Griffith University, Griffith Law School

Date Written: March 7, 2017

Abstract

Throughout civilisation, people have used various methods to signify or evidence their intent, from oral agreements to the symbolic passing of dirt. Widespread literacy has enabled signatures to become the de jure method of evidencing this intention. As technology has improved, the methods for giving one’s signature have become widely varied. What is the definition of a ‘signature’, and how is that reflected in the current state of technology? What about the future? Should specific technology be incorporated into law? This paper explores those questions to examine the flexibility of Australia’s signature laws, and suggests issues for reform.

Keywords: Evidence, Signature, Technology

JEL Classification: K12, K22

Suggested Citation

Weber, Dane, Tech Neutrality in Australian Signature Law (March 7, 2017). (2016) 24 Journal of Law, Information and Science 101, Griffith University Law School Research Paper No. 17-10, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2929147

Dane Weber (Contact Author)

Griffith University, Griffith Law School ( email )

Nathan Campus, GU
Nathan
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
85
Abstract Views
455
Rank
535,401
PlumX Metrics