Protecting Suprarationality

Persona y Derecho 74, 2016, 203-221.

21 Pages Posted: 10 Mar 2017

See all articles by Rafael Domingo

Rafael Domingo

University of Navarra - School of Law

Date Written: March 9, 2017

Abstract

In this paper, I address religion from a legal perspective. I argue that religion should be settled outside the secular legal system; otherwise, the secular legal system would not be truly secular. However, religion demands special protection as a public good and social value, as it constitutes an extrinsic constitutional limit of the legal. For a secular legal system, protecting religion ultimately means protecting human beings’ pursuit of the suprarational. Protecting suprarationality has three important legal consequences: (a) suprarational acts in the strictest sense should never be validated as legal acts; (b) democratic communities should not use suprarational arguments in legal discourse; and (c) the secular legal system cannot regulate suprarationality or the essentials of the religious community. The protection of religion demands both a dualistic structure that distinguishes the political community from the religious community and the treatment of religion as a right: the right to religion.

Keywords: religion, suprarationality, religious freedom, conscience

Suggested Citation

Domingo Osle, Rafael, Protecting Suprarationality (March 9, 2017). Persona y Derecho 74, 2016, 203-221., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2930480

Rafael Domingo Osle (Contact Author)

University of Navarra - School of Law ( email )

Universidad de Navarra
Campus Universitario
Pamplona, Navarra 31009
Spain

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
178
Abstract Views
798
Rank
305,000
PlumX Metrics