Modelling Fundamental Legal Change: The Paradox of Context and the Context of Paradox

Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence XXVIII No.1 January 2015, 77-96

20 Pages Posted: 15 Mar 2017

Date Written: January 1, 2015

Abstract

The author takes the paradox of omnipotence faced by lawyers in the context of constitutional change as a starting point to explore the relationship between formal law, logic, and the “pragmatics” that inform legal reasoning. Self-reference in constitutions appears problematic because it has no representation in basic, first-order logic. But self-reference in the context of legal change effectively represents a time dimension that is essential to the practice of law. The dissolution of the paradox is then used to illuminate the relationship between formal law and the context in which it is embedded. The author concludes with a nuanced understanding of law as a semi-open system in which judges play the key role of translating fundamental constitutional change into the law’s “internal” point of view.

Suggested Citation

Gelinas, Fabien, Modelling Fundamental Legal Change: The Paradox of Context and the Context of Paradox (January 1, 2015). Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence XXVIII No.1 January 2015, 77-96, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2931484 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2931484

Fabien Gelinas (Contact Author)

McGill University ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal, Quebec H3A1W9
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
367
Rank
653,722
PlumX Metrics