International Accounting Databases on WRDS: Comparative Analysis

42 Pages Posted: 23 Mar 2017

See all articles by Rui Dai

Rui Dai

Wharton Research Data Services (WRDS)

Date Written: March 12, 2012

Abstract

While multiple data vendors have claimed to offer a comprehensive international coverage of accounting and financial items for firms worldwide, there is a growing demand for better understanding of the differences across international databases. This paper compares several international accounting databases on WRDS to address this traditional obstacle confronting empirical researchers. I document important issues on the data coverage at the firm and country level, the sample overlap, and the discrepancies in coverage of various data items for FactSet Fundamentals, Compustat Global, and Bureau Van Dijk’s international databases. The main conclusions are threefold: 1) Compustat Global features greater coverage of large companies in more developed countries and provides a wider range of accounting data items than any other databases; 2) BvD Osiris offers lesser variety of accounting data items, but it also contains a higher number of small firms from developing countries; 3) finally, FactSet Fundamentals Database provides a balance in the firm size and quantity of accounting items with a reasonable geographical coverage.

Keywords: International Finance Databases

JEL Classification: F30, C55

Suggested Citation

Dai, Rui, International Accounting Databases on WRDS: Comparative Analysis (March 12, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2938675 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2938675

Rui Dai (Contact Author)

Wharton Research Data Services (WRDS) ( email )

3819 Chestnut St
Suite 300
Philadelphia, PA PA 19104
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,617
Abstract Views
6,303
Rank
20,779
PlumX Metrics