The Belgian Constitutional Court and the Administrative Loop: A Difficult Understanding
23 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2017
Date Written: March 31, 2017
Abstract
This article focuses on the introduction of the administrative loop before the Belgian administrative courts. It aims to assess the compliance of this new procedural tool with the principles of the rule of law and fundamental (procedural) rights, as interpreted by the Belgian Constitutional Court. It is established that the initial Flemish version of the administrative loop, which finds its origin in Dutch administrative procedural law, was given a much more limited scope than the Dutch loop. It is exactly this limited scope of the Flemish loop that resulted in fundamental objections from the perspective of the rule of law and fundamental procedural rights and brought the Constitutional Court to annul of the Flemish loop. Whilst the federal version of the administrative loop differed in some aspects from the annulled Flemish loop, it was also given a very limited scope. Hence, also the federal version of the loop was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court. The latest version of the administrative loop, which was introduced by the Flemish decree of 3 July 2015 before the Flemish administrative courts, differs on several essential aspects from the previous unconstitutional legislation. It seems that the Flemish legislator in this way succeeded in its efforts to appease the objections of the Constitutional Court and to comply with the principles of the rule of law and fundamental (procedural) rights.
Keywords: Belgian administrative loop, Case law Constitutional Court, Rule of law, Fundamental procedural rights
JEL Classification: K00, K19, K23, K41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation