Persistent Activist Communication in Occupy Gezi

Sociology, Forthcoming

33 Pages Posted: 4 Apr 2017 Last revised: 8 Apr 2017

See all articles by Dan Mercea

Dan Mercea

City University London

Duygu Karatas

University of Westminster

Marco T. Bastos

University College Dublin; City, University of London

Date Written: March 31, 2017

Abstract

We revisit the notion of activist persistence against the backdrop of protest communication on Twitter. We take an event-based approach and examine Occupy Gezi, a series of protests that occurred in Turkey in the early summer of 2013. By cross-referencing survey data with longitudinal Twitter data and in-depth interviews, we investigate the relationship between biographical availability, relational and organisational ties, social and personal costs to persistent activism online and on-location. Contrary to expectations, we find no clear-cut relationship between those factors and sustained commitment to participation in the occupation. We show that persistent activist communication did not feed into enduring organisational structures despite the continuous online activity observed during and beyond the peak of the Gezi occupation. The article concludes with reflections on the organisational ramifications of persistent communication and its significance in a political context posing high risks to participation in dissident politics.

Keywords: Activism, Availability, Organisation, Occupy Gezi, Persistence, Twitter

Suggested Citation

Mercea, Dan and Karatas, Duygu and Bastos, Marco T. and Bastos, Marco T., Persistent Activist Communication in Occupy Gezi (March 31, 2017). Sociology, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2944356 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2944356

Dan Mercea (Contact Author)

City University London ( email )

London
United Kingdom

Duygu Karatas

University of Westminster ( email )

309 Regent Street
London, W1R 8AL
United Kingdom

Marco T. Bastos

University College Dublin ( email )

Belfield
Belfield, Dublin 4 4
Ireland

City, University of London ( email )

London
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
39
Abstract Views
669
PlumX Metrics