Disabling Forensic Mental Health Detention: The Carcerality of the Disabled Body

DOI: 10.1177/1462474516680204; (2017) in special issue: ‘The Maelstrom of Punishment, Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability and Cognitive Impairment’, Forthcoming

47 Pages Posted: 3 May 2017

See all articles by Linda Steele

Linda Steele

University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Law

Date Written: November 24, 2016

Abstract

‘Disabling’ forensic detention involves challenging the self-evidence of the meaning of disability in forensic mental health law, and in turn illuminating the significance of this meaning to the possibility and permissibility of forensic detention and other interventions in the bodies of people with cognitive impairments and psychosocial disabilities (‘people with disability’). I apply this approach to an examination of a case study of one individual subjected to forensic detention: an Indigenous Australian woman with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder, Roseanne Fulton. By examining Fulton’s forensic detention, in the context of her earlier life circumstances and her subsequent journey through various ‘alternatives’ to this forensic detention I show the interrelationships of forensic detention with a range of legal options for punishing, regulating and intervening in disabled bodies and situate these interrelationships in a broader range of issues of violence, institutional failure, social disadvantage, settler colonialism and ableism. My central argument is that the ongoing subjection of Fulton to a range of forms of control across her life suggest that the possibility of forensic detention and other forms of punishment of people with disability is not attached to a particular material architectural space or a particular legal order, but instead attaches to these individuals’ bodies via medico-legal designations as disabled and travels with these individuals through time and space. I propose that more directly it is the disabled body that is the space of punishment and the disabled body makes material architectural spaces punitive. A ‘reform’, indeed even an ‘abolition’, approach focused on material architectural spaces of disabled punishment will not interrupt the ongoing processes of control of criminalized people with disability if it does not also acknowledge and challenge the temporal and carnal logics underpinning the carcerality of the disabled body itself.

Keywords: disability, Indigenous, forensic mental health, critical disability studies, violence, indefinite detention

Suggested Citation

Steele, Linda, Disabling Forensic Mental Health Detention: The Carcerality of the Disabled Body (November 24, 2016). DOI: 10.1177/1462474516680204; (2017) in special issue: ‘The Maelstrom of Punishment, Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability and Cognitive Impairment’, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2959895

Linda Steele (Contact Author)

University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Law ( email )

Sydney
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
302
PlumX Metrics