Consequences for Broken Political Promises: Lawyer-Politicians and the Rules of Professional Conduct

10:2 Journal of Parliamentary & Political Law 337

18 Pages Posted: 5 May 2017

See all articles by Andrew Flavelle Martin

Andrew Flavelle Martin

Dalhousie University - Schulich School of Law

Date Written: November 15, 2016

Abstract

Politicians sometimes break their promises. Canadian law is clear that the only recourse is for voters at the ballot box. However, politicians who happen to be lawyers are ostensibly governed by the rules of professional conduct. Under these rules, certain promises, termed undertakings, are special. Courts and law societies will enforce these promises and/or impose consequences for their breach against practicing lawyers. This article considers how the rule on undertakings should apply to political promises made by lawyer-politicians. The article begins with a brief summary of the rules of professional conduct as they apply to lawyer-politicians and to lawyers’ undertakings. The article then turns to the case law on broken political promises. Finally, the article argues that the rule of professional conduct on undertakings should apply to lawyer-politicians’ promises in limited circumstances, and specifically when these promises take pseudo-legal form such as signed contracts and pledges.

Keywords: legal ethics, politics, politicians, rules of professional conduct, campaign promises

Suggested Citation

Martin, Andrew, Consequences for Broken Political Promises: Lawyer-Politicians and the Rules of Professional Conduct (November 15, 2016). 10:2 Journal of Parliamentary & Political Law 337, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2963082

Andrew Martin (Contact Author)

Dalhousie University - Schulich School of Law ( email )

6061 University Avenue
6061 University Ave
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4H9
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
125
Abstract Views
981
Rank
410,556
PlumX Metrics