Rules Versus Discretion in Monetary Policy Historically Contemplated

50 Pages Posted: 25 May 2017

Date Written: May 24, 2017

Abstract

Monetary-policy rules are attempts to cope with the implications of having a medium of exchange whose value exceeds its cost of production. Two classes of monetary rules can be identified: (1) price rules that target the value of money in terms of a real commodity, e.g., gold, or in terms of some index of prices, and (2) quantity rules that target the quantity of money in circulation. Historically, price rules, e.g. the gold standard, have predominated, but the Bank Charter Act of 1844 imposed a quantity rule as an adjunct to the gold standard, because the gold standard had performed unsatisfactorily after being restored in Britain at the close of the Napoleonic Wars. A quantity rule was not proposed independently of a price rule until Henry Simons proposed a constant money supply consisting of government-issued fiat currency and deposits issued by banks operating on a 100-percent reserve basis. Simons argued that such a plan would be ideal if it could be implemented because it would deprive the monetary authority of any discretionary decision-making power. Nevertheless, Simons concluded that such a plan was impractical and supported a price rule to stabilized the price level. Simons’s student Milton Friedman revived Simons’s argument against discretion and modified Simons plan for 100-percent reserve banking and a constant money supply into his k-percent rule for monetary growth. This paper examines the doctrinal and ideological origins and background that lay behind the rules versus discretion distinction.

Keywords: rules versus discretion, price-specie-flow mechanism, monetary policy, Bank Charter Act, Chicago Plan, 100-percent-reserve banking, Currency School, Banking School, Bullionist debates, gold standard, Lucas Critique, Goodhart's Law

JEL Classification: E00, E02, E42, E51, E52, E58, E61

Suggested Citation

Glasner, David, Rules Versus Discretion in Monetary Policy Historically Contemplated (May 24, 2017). Journal of Macroeconomics, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2973620

David Glasner (Contact Author)

Federal government agency ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
485
Abstract Views
3,517
Rank
107,956
PlumX Metrics