Deceiving Two Masters: The Effects of Labor Market Incentives on Reporting Bias and Market Efficiency

60 Pages Posted: 31 May 2017 Last revised: 13 Jul 2022

See all articles by Miró Feller

Miró Feller

University of Zurich

Ulrich Schäfer

University of Vienna

Date Written: July 12, 2022

Abstract

We study managers’ decisions to bias financial reports that are used not only in capital markets but also in labor markets. Managers manipulate reports to influence the labor market assessment of their talents. This manipulation introduces noise in financial reports and reduces their usefulness for capital markets. We study the determinants of price informativeness and expected reporting bias as two measures of capital market efficiency and develop novel predictions. For instance, higher uncertainty about firm fundamentals can decrease earnings response coefficients if the uncertainty is related to managers’ unknown talents. Supplemental disclosures on managerial talent help mitigate the detrimental effects of managers’ labor market incentives. We find that such disclosures may become more useful if they are increasingly susceptible to manipulation.

Keywords: reporting bias, labor markets, multiple audience, market efficiency

JEL Classification: G14, J24, M12

Suggested Citation

Feller, Miró and Schäfer, Ulrich, Deceiving Two Masters: The Effects of Labor Market Incentives on Reporting Bias and Market Efficiency (July 12, 2022). AAA 2018 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2976423 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2976423

Miró Feller

University of Zurich ( email )

Rämistrasse 71
Zürich, CH-8006
Switzerland

Ulrich Schäfer (Contact Author)

University of Vienna ( email )

Bruenner Strasse 72
Vienna, Vienna 1090
Austria

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
283
Abstract Views
2,402
Rank
198,021
PlumX Metrics