Dynamic Pricing and Organic Waste Bans: A Study of Grocery Retailers' Incentives to Reduce Food Waste

42 Pages Posted: 28 Jun 2017 Last revised: 22 Dec 2023

See all articles by Robert Evan Sanders

Robert Evan Sanders

University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Rady School of Management

Date Written: May 12, 2020

Abstract

I analyze the welfare effects of two potential solutions to excess grocery-retail food waste: dynamic pricing and organic waste landfill bans. I use a structural econometric model with sales, perishability, and marginal cost data from a grocery chain’s artisanal bread category. My analysis of these counterfactuals shows that dynamic pricing Pareto-dominates an organic waste ban: Dynamic pricing reduces waste by 21% while increasing the chain’s gross margins and consumer surplus by 3% and 0.3%, respectively. In contrast, an organic waste ban, simulated by a ten-fold increase in disposal costs, reduces waste by only 4% and decreases profits and consumer surplus. Therefore, if regulators want to reduce grocery-store waste, they should incentivize chains to adopt dynamic pricing over imposing organic waste bans.

(Formerly titled "Reducing Retailer Food Waste through Revenue Management")

Keywords: dynamic pricing, environmental externality, food waste, organic waste ban, mandatory-recycling program

JEL Classification: D61, D62, H21, H23, Q58, D81

Suggested Citation

Sanders, Robert Evan, Dynamic Pricing and Organic Waste Bans: A Study of Grocery Retailers' Incentives to Reduce Food Waste (May 12, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2994426 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2994426

Robert Evan Sanders (Contact Author)

University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Rady School of Management ( email )

9500 Gilman Drive
Rady School of Management
La Jolla, CA 92093
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,568
Abstract Views
6,046
Rank
21,977
PlumX Metrics