Why Pyeatte v. Pyeatte Might Be the Best Teaching Tool in the Contracts Casebook

11 Pages Posted: 27 Jul 2017 Last revised: 30 Aug 2017

See all articles by Charles R. Calleros

Charles R. Calleros

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Date Written: July 25, 2017

Abstract

The author explains why a relatively obscure judicial opinion is among the best teaching tools in a contracts course. He invites other faculty to share their favorite judicial opinions for the classroom case method, either in a course on contracts or in other courses.

Keywords: Case Method; Teaching Tools; Contracts; Quasi-Contract

JEL Classification: K12

Suggested Citation

Calleros, Charles R., Why Pyeatte v. Pyeatte Might Be the Best Teaching Tool in the Contracts Casebook (July 25, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3008973 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3008973

Charles R. Calleros (Contact Author)

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )

Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
210
Abstract Views
1,212
Rank
265,000
PlumX Metrics