Is Capping Executive Bonuses Useful?

38 Pages Posted: 9 Aug 2017

See all articles by Kentaro Asai

Kentaro Asai

Australian National University (ANU) - College of Business and Economics

Date Written: September 2016

Abstract

This paper develops a theoretical framework to study the impact of bonus caps on banks' risk taking. In the model, labor market price adjustments can offset the direct effects of bonus caps. The calibrated model suggests that bonus caps are only effective when bank executives' mobility is restricted. It also suggests, irrespective of the degree of labor market mobility, bonus caps simultaneously reduce risk shifting by bank executives (too much risk taking because of limited liability), but aggravate underinvestment (bank executives foregoing risky but productive projects). Hence, the welfare effects of bonus caps critically depend on initial conditions, including the relative importance of risk shifting versus underinvestment.

Keywords: Labor markets, Labor mobility, Risk management, Bonus, Econometric models, Employee compensation, Banks, Investment, executive compensation; risk taking; risk shifting; underinvestment, executive compensation, risk taking, risk shifting, underinvestment, Government Policy and Regulation, Personnel Economics: Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects, General, International, or Comparative

JEL Classification: G32, G38, J33, M52, N20

Suggested Citation

Asai, Kentaro, Is Capping Executive Bonuses Useful? (September 2016). IMF Working Paper No. 16/196, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3014028

Kentaro Asai (Contact Author)

Australian National University (ANU) - College of Business and Economics ( email )

Canberra
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
75
Abstract Views
384
Rank
576,502
PlumX Metrics