Building Ethics Regimes: Capabilities, Obstacles and Supports for Professional Ethical Decision-Making

32 Pages Posted: 15 Aug 2017

Date Written: August 13, 2017

Abstract

In professional life, as elsewhere, many distinct processes must be successfully navigated for principled moral action to take place. Professionals need to be sensitive to situational factors that call for moral consideration; they need to be capable of reflecting on those features to arrive at a justifiable course of action; they need to possess moral motives that prioritise this outcome; and they need to possess character traits that empower them to actually perform the action. In some cases, professionals may also need to possess a certain competence to achieve a morally successful outcome. Failures by professionals to live up to their professional duties and ethical codes can occur through a breakdown in any one of these several processes. Such a failure might be individual in nature, or it might occur because of a lack of the requisite social and institutional supports. This article develops a model of an ‘ethics regime’ for the professions, describing the types of institutions, practices and initiatives that can be employed to improve professionals’ functioning on each of the distinct processes - processes that together contribute to effective moral outcomes.

Keywords: Ethics regime, Ethics standards, Professions

JEL Classification: K4, K19

Suggested Citation

Breakey, Hugh E, Building Ethics Regimes: Capabilities, Obstacles and Supports for Professional Ethical Decision-Making (August 13, 2017). University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2017, Griffith University Law School Research Paper No. 17-17, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3018180

Hugh E Breakey (Contact Author)

Griffith University ( email )

170 Kessels Road
Nathan, Queensland QLD 4111
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
107
Abstract Views
558
Rank
457,076
PlumX Metrics