Bans, Borders, and Sovereignty: Judicial Review of Immigration Law in the Trump Administration

61 Pages Posted: 1 Sep 2017 Last revised: 10 Nov 2017

See all articles by Peter Margulies

Peter Margulies

Roger Williams University School of Law

Date Written: August 30, 2017

Abstract

President Donald Trump’s Executive Orders (EOs) limiting entry into the U.S. have already reached the Supreme Court. September 2017’s EO-3, which indefinitely barred immigration of nationals from listed countries, has raised profound questions about the political branches’ role in immigration and the nature of judicial review. The Court’s longstanding model of deference to the political branches is showing strain. Unfortunately, the model advanced by frequent critics of the Court’s deferential approach – the normalization approach for the convergence of immigration and domestic law – throws out the baby with the bathwater, unduly discounting the foreign policy dimension of immigration measures.

To fill the gap, this Article proposes a model of shared stewardship. Shared stewardship springs from the Framers’ vision that governance is a trust. When the political branches exhibit the habits of deliberation that the Framers linked with sound governance, courts should not intervene. However, when those habits of deliberation fail, courts should exercise the independent judgment that Hamilton viewed as their signature virtue. This model centers on the crucial decision in judicial review: the closeness of means-end fit that courts should require. To answer this question, shared stewardship proposes a three-pronged model: 1) degree of sovereign interest, 2) number and intensity of collateral impacts, and, 3) intelligible limits. Because of the absence of a coherent limiting principle, EO-3’s indefinite ban on immigration subverts the overarching scheme of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Suggested Citation

Margulies, Peter, Bans, Borders, and Sovereignty: Judicial Review of Immigration Law in the Trump Administration (August 30, 2017). Michigan State Law Review, Forthcoming, Roger Williams Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 177, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3029655

Peter Margulies (Contact Author)

Roger Williams University School of Law ( email )

10 Metacom Avenue
Bristol, RI 02809
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
293
Abstract Views
2,398
Rank
189,557
PlumX Metrics