Power, Proximity, and Democracy: Geopolitical Competition in the International System

49 Pages Posted: 2 Oct 2017

See all articles by Jonathan Markowitz

Jonathan Markowitz

University of Southern California

Christopher J. Fariss

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Political Science

Date Written: 2017

Abstract

Why do only some powerful states choose to develop power projection capabilities, but not others? To answer this question, we advance the theoretical proposition that states choose to develop power projection capabilities when they face a competitive geopolitical environment. This proposition is derived from our theory, which is used to construct a new measure of the level of geopolitical competition that every state in the system faces. This measure incorporates each state’s relative geographic position to every other state in the international system, the relative amount of economic power of those other states, and the degree to which their interests are compatible. We then apply this unique country-year measure to test the proposition that competitive environments are associated with the development of power projection capabilities, as measured by the tonnage and count of naval ships maintained by each country each year. We demonstrate that our measure helps explain the degree to which states choose to invest in power projection capabilities.

Keywords: democratic institutions, military power, international security, interstate conflict, liberal peace

Suggested Citation

Markowitz, Jonathan and Fariss, Christopher J., Power, Proximity, and Democracy: Geopolitical Competition in the International System (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3045467 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3045467

Jonathan Markowitz (Contact Author)

University of Southern California ( email )

2250 Alcazar Street
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Christopher J. Fariss

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Political Science ( email )

Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
678
Rank
622,763
PlumX Metrics