Transmission Policy in Alberta and Bill 50

University of Calgary, The School of Public Policy, SPP Research Paper, November 2009

54 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2017

See all articles by Jeffrey Church

Jeffrey Church

University of Calgary - Department of Economics

William D. Rosehart

University of Calgary

John MacCormack

University of Calgary

Date Written: November 2, 2009

Abstract

Various plans developed by the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) have indicated for some time a need for expansion of the Alberta electrical transmission system. This was also recommended in Alberta’s Provincial Energy Strategy released in December of 2008 and it seems generally accepted that some expansion is appropriate. However, there are many complex issues involved in determining the exact nature and extent of this expansion. These issues have traditionally been sorted out through the work of the AESO, followed by a formal application and open hearings by the regulator, the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC).

In June of 2009 the Alberta government proposed new amendments (Bill 50) to the Electric Utilities Act, the Hydro and Electric Energy Act, and the Alberta Utilities Commission Act that significantly alter the regulatory process for the approval of new high-voltage transmission lines. Bill 50 introduces the concept of Critical Transmission Infrastructure (CTI), defined as transmission and related facilities determined by the government to be in the public interest.

Under this Bill, CTI is subject to substantially reduced regulatory oversight by the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC). It suspends the regulatory framework established under the Electric Utilities Act requiring the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) to demonstrate a “need” for the facilities and a finding by the AUC that the facilities are in the public interest.

Bill 50 also identifies the following four transmission projects as critical infrastructure: • Two High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) transmission facilities in the Edmonton-Calgary corridor, each with a minimum capacity of 2,000 megawatts (MW). • A double circuit 500 kV alternating current line between Edmonton and the GibbonsRedwater region. • A new 240 kV substation in southeast Calgary. • Two single-circuit 500 kV alternating current lines between Edmonton and Fort McMurray.

The estimated cost for these four projects is approximately $5.7 billion. The cost for the two HVDC lines in the Edmonton-Calgary corridor is more than $3.1 billion. The four projects in Bill 50 are a subset of the $14.5 billion for transmission projects identified in the Long-term Transmission System Plan filed by the AESO in June of 2009.

Suggested Citation

Church, Jeffrey and Rosehart, William D. and MacCormack, John, Transmission Policy in Alberta and Bill 50 (November 2, 2009). University of Calgary, The School of Public Policy, SPP Research Paper, November 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3050175 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3050175

Jeffrey Church (Contact Author)

University of Calgary - Department of Economics ( email )

2500 University Drive, NW
Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4
Canada

William D. Rosehart

University of Calgary ( email )

University Drive
Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4
Canada

John MacCormack

University of Calgary ( email )

University Drive
Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
93
Abstract Views
628
Rank
506,544
PlumX Metrics