Recovering Stolen Art ? Australian, English and Us Law on Limitations of Action

23 Pages Posted: 26 Feb 2020

See all articles by Andrew T. Kenyon

Andrew T. Kenyon

University of Melbourne Law School

Simon Mackenzie

University of Glasgow

Date Written: 2002

Abstract

Statutory limitations periods can bar claims to recover stolen artworks. In doing this, Australian limitations law generally does not consider the conduct of either a dispossessed owner or current possessor of a stolen work. This paper compares Australian, English and US law on the issue and argues that recent reform suggestions should be extended so Australian law does encourage all art market actors to be diligent in their dealings with works that may have been stolen.

Keywords: comparative law, property law

JEL Classification: K10, K11

Suggested Citation

Kenyon, Andrew T. and Mackenzie, Simon, Recovering Stolen Art ? Australian, English and Us Law on Limitations of Action (2002). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=307980 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.307980

Andrew T. Kenyon (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne Law School ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010
Australia
61 3 8344 9972 (Phone)
61 3 9348 0973 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/cmcl/

Simon Mackenzie

University of Glasgow ( email )

The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research
Florentine House, 53 Hillhead St
Glasgow, G12 8QF
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.sccjr.ac.uk

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
472
Abstract Views
3,561
Rank
112,441
PlumX Metrics