Has the Court Changed or Have the Cases? The Deservingness of Litigants as an Element in Court of Justice Adjudication

Journal of European Public Policy (2018), Forthcoming

24 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2017

See all articles by Gareth T. Davies

Gareth T. Davies

VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Law

Date Written: November 30, 2017

Abstract

In recent cases concerning mobile citizens and access to social assistance the Court has sided with Member States against the litigating citizens. Given that in early cases it sided with the litigants, this has created the impression of a change in judicial perspective. This article looks at the most discussed sub-set of cases, and argues that a more plausible explanation lies in the changing characteristics of the litigants themselves – recent claims for social assistance are based on less meritorious facts. This raises a broader issue about research into judicial decisions: Trends in outcomes cannot be analysed without taking account of possible trends in inputs. These may vary due to changes in skills or strategies at national courts or authorities, or social changes leading to different litigant characteristics. Unless accounted for, claims that a court is changing its approach will be unreliable.

Keywords: Court of Justice of the European Union, Judicial Independence, Judicial Responsiveness, Social Assistance, Union Citizenship

Suggested Citation

Davies, Gareth T., Has the Court Changed or Have the Cases? The Deservingness of Litigants as an Element in Court of Justice Adjudication (November 30, 2017). Journal of European Public Policy (2018), Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3080200

Gareth T. Davies (Contact Author)

VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Law ( email )

De Boelelaan 1105
1081 HV Amsterdam
Netherlands

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
320
PlumX Metrics