Resettlement Risks in a Dynamic Perspective: A Case of Southern Transport Development Project in Sri Lanka

8 Pages Posted: 18 Dec 2017

See all articles by Akira Ozawa

Akira Ozawa

University of Tokyo - Department of Civil Engineering

So Morikawa

University of Tokyo - Department of Civil Engineering

Date Written: December 16, 2017

Abstract

Throughout the world, land acquisition and resettlement issues have been critical to infrastructure development projects. They not only lead to delays and additional costs in the development projects but also have negative impacts on many aspects of affected people’s lives. Therefore, social safeguard policies in international development agencies and multilateral development banks have tried to cover a broad range of resettlement risks and their mitigation measures.

Scholars have proposed several models to understand the issues and to propose risk mitigation measures. Among them, Cernea’s ‘impoverishment risks and reconstruction model’ (IRR) classified the negative effects of resettlement on local residents caused by development: landlessness, joblessness, homelessness, marginalization, food insecurity, loss of access to common property resources, increased morbidity and community disarticulation.

Meanwhile, IRR model has been criticized because the model fails to take account of the sequential and composite nature of risk. Dwivedi points out that risk unfolds in a complex sequence of events and there is a need to analyze risk management issues in a process based framework [ibid]. He also claims that IRR model diagnoses the problems only from the viewpoint of the planner. It does not provide the scope for affected people to define their losses or to express their opinion on displacement.

This study aims to investigate the degree of each risk and its changes after displacement in Southern Transport Development Project (STDP), which was the first highway project in Sri Lanka. Morikawa tried to identify the risks the affected people faced in resettlers’ perceptions in resettlement sites using Cernea’s model. Conducting questionnaire surveys in the resettlement sites again in 2016 enabled us to see the difference from the time of his visit in 2010-11, the degree of each risk and its changes after resettlement.

Our survey results show that different livelihood elements follow different recovery process. Infrastructure such as electricity and house have fairly improved while water issues have not been solved in more than 30% of the households. Many respondents answered they had bought bigger and more comfortable house than before resettlement. This lead to high satisfaction of “house” element but it sometimes ended up in their exhausting compensation and failure in life reconstruction. On the other hand, other element of living improved little and especially recovery rates of income, food and relations with relatives are quite low, implying that there might be room for improvement on resettlement policies for these elements. Job training was conducted after resettlement but many respondents answered it was not very useful for their life reconstruction.

The observations from our survey call for continuous assessment of resettlement risks in infrastructure development projects, and we claim that stage-wise evaluation, management and preparation of resettlement risks are necessary.

Keywords: Impoverishment Risk; Infrastructure Development; Land Acquisition; Livelihood Reconstruction; Resettlement

Suggested Citation

Ozawa, Akira and Morikawa, So, Resettlement Risks in a Dynamic Perspective: A Case of Southern Transport Development Project in Sri Lanka (December 16, 2017). OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 10, No. 12, pp. 27-34, 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3089231

Akira Ozawa (Contact Author)

University of Tokyo - Department of Civil Engineering ( email )

Yayoi 1-1-1
Bunkyo-ku
Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657
Japan

So Morikawa

University of Tokyo - Department of Civil Engineering ( email )

Yayoi 1-1-1
Bunkyo-ku
Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657
Japan

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
77
Abstract Views
375
Rank
563,673
PlumX Metrics