Build, Buy, or Partner? The Relative Performance of an Acquisitive Strategy

49 Pages Posted: 4 Jan 2018 Last revised: 29 Jun 2023

See all articles by Olubunmi Faleye

Olubunmi Faleye

Northeastern University - D'Amore-McKim School of Business

Date Written: June 29, 2023

Abstract

We conceptualize mergers as one of several strategies for creating value and study merger performance by evaluating the performance of firms employing an acquisitive strategy. Relative to other firms, acquisitive firms are valued lower, exhibit lower employee and total factor productivity, and innovate less. These effects are concentrated among firms whose workforce is vulnerable to acquisition-related personnel disruptions and/or those that are more dependent on employee relationship-specific investments. We therefore propose that an acquisitive strategy diminishes firm value and performance by fostering disruptive conditions that undermine employee effectiveness and weaken their incentives.

Keywords: mergers and acquisitions; corporate strategies; firm value; employee incentives

JEL Classification: G34

Suggested Citation

Faleye, Olubunmi, Build, Buy, or Partner? The Relative Performance of an Acquisitive Strategy (June 29, 2023). Northeastern U. D’Amore-McKim School of Business Research Paper No. 3094885, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3094885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3094885

Olubunmi Faleye (Contact Author)

Northeastern University - D'Amore-McKim School of Business ( email )

Boston, MA 02115
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
223
Abstract Views
985
Rank
250,548
PlumX Metrics