The ‘Right’ Right to Environmental Protection: What We Can Discern From the American and Indian Constitutional Experience

55 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2018

See all articles by Deepa Badrinarayana

Deepa Badrinarayana

Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law

Date Written: 2017

Abstract

The best legal mechanism to protect the environment remains a complex and contentious issue. Many normative questions with practical implications remain. Should the legal response be in the foundational document of most legal systems, the Constitution? If so, should a Constitution create a specific right to environmental protection, or are statutory responses to address environmental problems adequate? If one considers environmental protection globally, both constitutional and legislative responses to environmental protection prevail. Yet, neither alone is adequate. Environmental legislation may not cater to individual rights, especially when legislated from a utilitarian platform. A constitutional right to environmental protection can protect individuals from environmental harm, but does not necessarily correlate to better or stronger environmental protection. Consider the examples of the United States and India.

Keywords: Environmental Law, Environmental Justice, Constitutional Law, Indian Constitution, United States Constitution, India

Suggested Citation

Badrinarayana, Deepa, The ‘Right’ Right to Environmental Protection: What We Can Discern From the American and Indian Constitutional Experience (2017). Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3103440

Deepa Badrinarayana (Contact Author)

Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law ( email )

One University Drive
Orange, CA 92866-1099
United States
714-628-2673 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
564
Abstract Views
2,978
Rank
90,353
PlumX Metrics