The Carolingians, the Church, & the Medieval Constitution

The Social Science Journal, Forthcoming

28 Pages Posted: 28 Feb 2018 Last revised: 20 Aug 2018

See all articles by Andrew T. Young

Andrew T. Young

Texas Tech University - Rawls College of Business

Date Written: August 1, 2018

Abstract

In the eighth century, Charles Martel confiscated Church property to make distributions of benefices and precaria to his vassals. This project was an investment in state capacity and secularizations of Church property were continued under Charles’ son Pippin III. Many scholars have characterized this development as the expansion of Carolingian (monarchical) authority at the expense of the Church and to the benefit of the lay nobility. I argue that a better characterization is one of constitutional bargains that, taken together, benefited the Church as well as the Carolingians and their noble vassals. This opportunity for mutually beneficial constitutional exchange arose because of a decrease in the importance of trade relative to landed wealth and the increased papal insecurity resulting from Muslim and Lombard threats.

Keywords: medieval economic history, comparative economic development, medieval constitution, state capacity, political property rights, polycentric governance

JEL Classification: N44, O10, O52, P50, K00

Suggested Citation

Young, Andrew T., The Carolingians, the Church, & the Medieval Constitution (August 1, 2018). The Social Science Journal, Forthcoming , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125906 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3125906

Andrew T. Young (Contact Author)

Texas Tech University - Rawls College of Business ( email )

Lubbock, TX 79409
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
352
Abstract Views
1,779
Rank
157,167
PlumX Metrics