Rating Through-the-Cycle: Implications for Rating Stability and Accuracy. Empirical evidence

18 Pages Posted: 2 Mar 2018 Last revised: 9 Jan 2024

See all articles by John Kiff

John Kiff

Satoshi Capital Advisors; Sovereign Official Digital Association (SODA)

Michael Kisser

BI Norwegian Business School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: January 8, 2024

Abstract

Through-the-cycle (TTC) ratings attempt to discriminate between high and low risk borrowers by forecasting large adverse changes in credit quality under conditions of moderate stress. While the TTC methodology increases rating stability relative to market ratings, it is an open empirical question whether stable ratings come at the cost of lower accuracy. Using a novel and large dataset of banks' internal TTC ratings provided by the Global Credit Data Consortium, we fail to find evidence of an accuracy-stability tradeoff. These findings are robust over time and across asset classes.

Keywords: credit ratings, through-the-cycle, rating accuracy, rating stability

Suggested Citation

Kiff, John and Kisser, Michael, Rating Through-the-Cycle: Implications for Rating Stability and Accuracy. Empirical evidence (January 8, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3127545 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3127545

John Kiff

Satoshi Capital Advisors ( email )

85 Broad Street
Floor 17
New York, NY New York 10004
United States

Sovereign Official Digital Association (SODA) ( email )

15976 Woodgrove Road
Purcellville, VA 20132
United States
5714982777 (Phone)

Michael Kisser (Contact Author)

BI Norwegian Business School ( email )

Nydalsveien 37
Oslo, 0442
Norway

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
182
Abstract Views
1,402
Rank
219,113
PlumX Metrics