Geoscience and Sustainability – In between Keywords and Buzzwords

Geoforum, Forthcoming

4 Pages Posted: 3 Apr 2018

Date Written: March 2, 2018

Abstract

This paper explores how scientists entangle themselves in between keywords and buzzwords when they make use of concepts like sustainability. It sketches out theoretical distinctions between keywords and buzzwords. Then it turns to the concept of nature discussing the paradox that nature embraces the same fuzzy, slippery and contingent character as does sustainability, yet the former has a deep ontological status, the latter does not. The paper explores a related paradox: natural sciences claim we live in the Anthropocene, in which humans have transformed geochemical cycles, e.g. of methane and carbon dioxide as much as they changed between glacial and interglacial periods. Yet, science favors (external) nature as a keyword, sustainability as a buzzword. This should cause deep reflections on how scientists make use of the power of reference in between keywords and buzzwords – as well as critical reflection on the institutionalization of such concepts.

Keywords: sustainability science, anthropocene, neoliberal universities, social nature, political ecologies of reference making

Suggested Citation

Grindsted, Thomas, Geoscience and Sustainability – In between Keywords and Buzzwords (March 2, 2018). Geoforum, Forthcoming , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3132958

Thomas Grindsted (Contact Author)

Roskilde University ( email )

Universitetsvej 1
P.O. Box 260
Roskilde, DK-4000
Denmark

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
26
Abstract Views
297
PlumX Metrics