Tax Law's Loss Obsession

42 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2018 Last revised: 27 Mar 2024

See all articles by Emily Cauble

Emily Cauble

University of Wisconsin Law School

Date Written: March 6, 2018

Abstract

This Article will address tax law’s inconsistent treatment of gains and losses – focusing in particular on certain instances in which a taxpayer is prevented from shifting a built-in loss to another taxpayer but would be allowed to shift a built-in gain to another taxpayer. The article will explore whether any legitimate justification can explain the inconsistency. Finding no such legitimate justification for at least some of the examples, this Article will conclude that lawmakers ought to have also addressed gains and the failure to do so results from lawmakers crafting an overly narrow response that addressed only the most recent, high profile gimmick in engineering transactions to reduce tax liability.

Keywords: Shifting Losses, Shifting Gains, Section 704(c), Section 1015

Suggested Citation

Cauble, Emily, Tax Law's Loss Obsession (March 6, 2018). 2018 Utah L. Rev. 979 (2018), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3135267

Emily Cauble (Contact Author)

University of Wisconsin Law School ( email )

975 Bascom Mall
Madison, WI 53706
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
80
Abstract Views
543
Rank
555,637
PlumX Metrics