Comment: Artis v. District of Columbia – What Did the Court Actually Say?
8 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2018
Date Written: March 27, 2018
Abstract
This short comment argues, in essence, that the Dissent has failed to understand the majority opinion. As a result, the direction to lower courts, lawyers, and potential plaintiff may be lacking.
Keywords: Federal Jurisdiction, Statutory Interpretation, Tolling Period, Supreme Court Review, Justice Gorsuch
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Kalir, Doron M., Comment: Artis v. District of Columbia – What Did the Court Actually Say? (March 27, 2018). Forthcoming, 94 Notre Dame L.Rev. Online _____ (2018), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3150833
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.