Lobbying Against the Odds

58 Pages Posted: 30 Apr 2018

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: March 1, 2018

Abstract

Conventional narratives maintain that groups that lack political power litigate because they cannot attain their goals politically. Yet lobbying by American Indians has increased over 600 percent since the late 1970s. And they are not alone. Other politically marginalized groups have also intensified their lobbying efforts over the past five decades. This raises an important question that scholars have yet to adequately answer: Why do some groups use legislative strategies to achieve their goals? This Article challenges the prevailing wisdom and demonstrates that groups sometimes lobby even when the odds are stacked against them. It uses insights from interest group studies to modify the existing sociolegal framework for understanding why groups litigate to provide a more complete explanation of when and why groups engage in different advocacy strategies. This modified sociolegal approach produces significant insights into how legal and political actors influence and are influenced by the institutions they turn to, but also enables us to see similar — and divergent — patterns across contexts. The Article presents original quantitative data to document the dramatic rise in American Indian lobbying from 1978 to 2012. Then it uses the modified sociolegal approach to explain how the relationships among courts, the political process, and groups facilitated American Indian legislative advocacy. It concludes by discussing the implications of the approach for studies of legal mobilization, interest groups, and federal Indian law.

Suggested Citation

Carlson, Kirsten Matoy, Lobbying Against the Odds (March 1, 2018). Harvard Journal on Legislation, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3160871

Kirsten Matoy Carlson (Contact Author)

Wayne State University Law School ( email )

471 Palmer
Detroit, MI 48202
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
28
Abstract Views
309
PlumX Metrics