Targeted State Economic Development Incentives and Entrepreneurship

Forthcoming, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy

27 Pages Posted: 7 Aug 2018

See all articles by Meg Tuszynski

Meg Tuszynski

Southern Methodist University (SMU) - O’Neil Center for Global Markets and Freedom

Dean Stansel

Southern Methodist University (SMU) - Bridwell Institute for Economic Freedom

Date Written: July 11, 2018

Abstract

Purpose – The main purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between state economic development incentives programs and entrepreneurial activity. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use panel data and a fixed-effects model to examine the determinants of five measures of entrepreneurial activity. To measure state economic development incentives programs, they use a new and substantially improved data set from Bartik (2017). They also include a measure for economic freedom, the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of North America index. Findings – The authors find a robustly negative relationship between development incentives and patent activity. They find some evidence that incentives are negatively associated with small business establishments (<10 employees) as a percentage of total establishments but positively associated with the large business establishment (>500 employees) share. They also find evidence of a positive relationship between economic freedom and both patent activity and net business formation. Research limitations/implications – The results imply that economic development incentive programs are unlikely to increase entrepreneurial activity and may decrease it. They also imply increased economic freedom (lower taxes, lower spending, and lower governmental restrictions on labor markets) may increase entrepreneurial activity. Originality/value – To our knowledge, we provide the first examination of the relationship between development incentives and entrepreneurial activity that utilizes Bartik (2017), a new vastly improved dataset of state economic development incentive programs. We also contribute to the literature on the relationship between economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity. Paper type – Research paper

Keywords: targeted development incentives, entrepreneurship, patents, business formation, sole proprietorship, economic freedom

JEL Classification: H25, H71, L26

Suggested Citation

Tuszynski, Meg and Stansel, Dean, Targeted State Economic Development Incentives and Entrepreneurship (July 11, 2018). Forthcoming, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3212411

Meg Tuszynski

Southern Methodist University (SMU) - O’Neil Center for Global Markets and Freedom ( email )

United States

Dean Stansel (Contact Author)

Southern Methodist University (SMU) - Bridwell Institute for Economic Freedom ( email )

Edwin L. Cox School of Business
Dallas, TX 75275-0333
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.smu.edu/cox/Our-People-and-Community/Faculty/Dean-Stansel

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
195
Abstract Views
2,047
Rank
279,817
PlumX Metrics