Unveiling the Historical Function of International Criminal Courts: Between Adjudicative and Sociopolitical Justice
International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol. 12, pp. 334-355, 2018
17 Pages Posted: 9 Aug 2018 Last revised: 29 May 2020
Date Written: May 29, 2018
Abstract
Within the field of international criminal justice, opinion remains divided concerning the extent to which international criminal courts should be expected to write history. Taking this debate as its point of departure, this article argues that contestation over the historical function of international criminal courts hinges on the underlying conception of justice – adjudicative or sociopolitical – to which scholars and practitioners adhere in practice. The article demonstrates how these rival conceptions of justice function less as static positions and more as lines of argumentation that can be deployed to support or critique the range of practices that shape the historical narratives constructed within international criminal courts in practice. The article concludes by identifying a potential avenue to advance the conversation on the historical function – one that would assist in articulating what should legitimately be expected of international criminal courts and enable their practices to be evaluated in a more textured manner.
Keywords: International Criminal Justice, International Criminal Courts, History, Narratives
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation