Constitutional Paternalism: The Rise and (Problematic) Use of Constitutional ‘Guardian’ Rhetoric

19 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2018

See all articles by Brian Christopher Jones

Brian Christopher Jones

University of Liverpool - School of Law & Social Justice

Date Written: July 1, 2018

Abstract

This article examines the origins and use of constitutional ‘guardian’ language, contending that the use of such language — which is now employed primarily in relation to the judiciary — is overly paternalistic and encounters both normative and consequentialist difficulties. The piece first attempts to pin down when ‘guardian’ language first arose, and when it took hold. It analyses written constitutions use of such language, finding that very few constitutions employ it — especially in relation to the judiciary. It then looks to judicial decisions from a number of jurisdictions, finding that some evidence points to a spike in this language within the past three decades. Then, it looks to legal scholarship, which demonstrates a sharp increase in such language over the past 3-4 decades. The second half of the piece discusses why using such language matters, arguing that the use of ‘guardian’ language is unnecessarily factional, and dissuades other constitutional actors from participating in constitutional maintenance and protection. Also, the judiciary’s understanding of guardian may be more legal than general, thus displaying the development of constitutional paternalism that is evident in many jurisdictions. Ultimately, the piece concludes that the judiciary — although serving a considerably important constitutional role — does not possess the exclusive right to assert ‘constitutional guardianship’ status.

Keywords: constitutional guardians, judicial rhetoric, constitutional rhetoric, paternalism, factionalism, constitutional maintenance

Suggested Citation

Jones, Brian Christopher, Constitutional Paternalism: The Rise and (Problematic) Use of Constitutional ‘Guardian’ Rhetoric (July 1, 2018). New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (JILP), Vol. 51, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3222256

Brian Christopher Jones (Contact Author)

University of Liverpool - School of Law & Social Justice ( email )

Brownlow Hill
Liverpool, L69 3BX
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Abstract Views
563
Rank
516,629
PlumX Metrics