Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Start-Ups

39 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2002

See all articles by Bruno Cassiman

Bruno Cassiman

Harvard University - Business School (HBS)

Masako Ueda

University of Wisconsin, Madison - School of Business; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 2002

Abstract

Entrants are typically found to be more innovative than incumbent firms. Furthermore, these innovative ideas often originate with established firms in the industry. Therefore, the established firm and the start-up firm seem to select different types of projects. We claim that this is the consequence of their optimal project allocation mechanism, which depends on their comparative advantage. The start-up firm may seem more 'innovative' than the established firm may because the comparative advantage of the start-up firm is to commercialize 'innovative' projects, i.e. projects that do not fit with the established firms' existing assets. Our model integrates various facts found in the industrial organization literature about the entry rate, firm focus, firm growth, industry growth and innovation. We also obtain some counter-intuitive results such that a reduction in the cost of start-ups may actually slow down start-ups and that the firm may voluntarily give away the property rights to the inventions discovered within the firm.

Keywords: Real option, project selection, new firm start-ups

JEL Classification: D21, G31, L11

Suggested Citation

Cassiman, Bruno and Ueda, Masako, Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Start-Ups (June 2002). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=323383

Bruno Cassiman (Contact Author)

Harvard University - Business School (HBS) ( email )

Soldiers Field Road
Morgan 270C
Boston, MA 02163
United States

Masako Ueda

University of Wisconsin, Madison - School of Business ( email )

975 University Avenue
Madison, WI 53706
United States
608-262-3656 (Phone)
608-265-4195 (Fax)

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
26
Abstract Views
5,511
PlumX Metrics