The Historical Record on Active vs. Passive Mutual Fund Performance

Posted: 13 Sep 2018 Last revised: 15 Sep 2021

See all articles by David Nanigian

David Nanigian

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: August 26, 2021

Abstract

This study examines the risk-adjusted performance of actively managed mutual funds vs. passively managed mutual funds between 1991 and 2019 and finds that there is no statistically significant difference in performance between the two types of funds when the passively managed funds are compared to competitively priced actively managed funds. The practical implication of this study is that, setting tax considerations aside, as long as investors are cost-conscious in their fund selection process, investing in passively managed funds does not meaningfully improve investor outcomes.

Keywords: Passive investing, Index funds, Actively managed funds, Mutual fund performance, Mutual fund fees, Mutual fund industry competition

JEL Classification: G11, G23

Suggested Citation

Nanigian, David, The Historical Record on Active vs. Passive Mutual Fund Performance (August 26, 2021). Forthcoming in The Journal of Investing, 2019 Academic Research Colloquium for Financial Planning and Related Disciplines, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3248056 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3248056

David Nanigian (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
6,742
PlumX Metrics