SWIFT Bank Heists and Article 4A

Journal of Consumer and Commercial Law, Vol. 22, No. 1, at 25 (2018)

U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3254505

7 Pages Posted: 16 Oct 2018 Last revised: 5 Nov 2018

See all articles by Julie Andersen Hill

Julie Andersen Hill

University of Alabama - School of Law

Date Written: September 24, 2018

Abstract

Computer hackers are capable of anonymously stealing billions of dollars through fraudulent wire transfers. Banks in Ecuador, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Nepal, India, Russia, and elsewhere have been attacked. When law enforcement is unsuccessful in tracking down the hackers, parties to the fraudulent transaction turn to the law to determine who must bear the loss. In the United States, responsibility for fraudulent wire transfers is governed by Article 4A of the Uniform Commercial Code. Because wire transfers are often routed through the United States or transferred pursuant to contracts with U.S. choice of law provisions, Article 4A will ultimately apportion the loss of at least some international cyber bank heists. This article explains how Article 4A works by considering the facts of a 2006 heist at Bangladesh Bank. It shows that Article 4A is unlikely to help most originators who find their SWIFT systems have been hacked. Originators of payment orders should carefully consider security procedures used to authenticate payment orders.

Keywords: Uniform Commercial Code, UCC, Article 4A, wire transfer, cybertheft, security procedures

JEL Classification: K20, K22

Suggested Citation

Hill, Julie Andersen, SWIFT Bank Heists and Article 4A (September 24, 2018). Journal of Consumer and Commercial Law, Vol. 22, No. 1, at 25 (2018), U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3254505, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3254505

Julie Andersen Hill (Contact Author)

University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
583
Abstract Views
1,739
Rank
85,492
PlumX Metrics