The Limits of Copyright Office Expertise

45 Pages Posted: 26 Oct 2018 Last revised: 13 May 2021

Date Written: 2018

Abstract

The mismatch between the expanding administrative and regulatory obligations of the United States Copyright Office and its limited institutional expertise is an emerging problem for the copyright system. The Office’s chief responsibility—registration and recordation of copyright claims—has taken a back seat in recent years to a more ambitious set of substantive rulemakings and policy recommendations. As the triennial rulemaking under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act highlights, the Office is frequently called upon to answer technological questions far beyond its plausible claims of subject matter expertise. This Article traces the Office’s history, identifies its substantial but discrete areas of expertise, and reveals the ways in which the Office has overstepped any reasonable definition of its expert knowledge. The Article concludes with a set of recommendations to better align the Office’s agenda with its expertise by, first, reducing the current regulatory burdens on the Office, and second, building greater technological and economic competence within the Office, better equipping it to address contemporary questions of copyright policy.

Keywords: copyright, copyright office, DMCA, rulemaking, expertise, expert agency

Suggested Citation

Perzanowski, Aaron, The Limits of Copyright Office Expertise (2018). 33 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 733 (2018), Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3257223

Aaron Perzanowski (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
136
Abstract Views
1,349
Rank
384,493
PlumX Metrics