Do Electoral Campaigns Influence Public Support for Trade? Evidence from the 2016 US Presidential Election

21 Pages Posted: 17 Nov 2018

See all articles by Michael Plouffe

Michael Plouffe

University College London - School of Public Policy

Jason Kuo

Georgetown University

Date Written: November 5, 2018

Abstract

The open-economy politics of trade presumes that elections, as a political institution, aggregate preferences of individual voters to resolve a salient trade cleavage in a democratic society. This presumption, despite being widely applied to analytical narratives of trade politics in the existing literature, has not been empirically tested. The 2016 US presidential election is unique in this regard; trade policy became a politically salient issue, and was treated as such during the electoral campaign. We exploit two waves of a nationally-representative panel survey conducted before and after the 2016 US presidential election to identify the effect of electoral campaigns on the change in public support for trade in general and trade agreements in particular. In contrast with the conventional wisdom, we find that the election and presidential campaigns not only aggregate preexisting individual preferences for trade, but also affect public support for trade. Our main result helps explain why political candidates continue to include trade as an electoral plank when campaigning. It also suggests that trade preferences of individual voters are more endogenous to domestic political institutions and contemporary political dynamics -- in this case, the presidential election and campaigns -- than previously assumed in the literature.

Keywords: trade preferences, presidential campaigns, presidential election, ipe

Suggested Citation

Plouffe, Michael and Kuo, Jason, Do Electoral Campaigns Influence Public Support for Trade? Evidence from the 2016 US Presidential Election (November 5, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3278778 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3278778

Michael Plouffe (Contact Author)

University College London - School of Public Policy ( email )

29/30 Tavistock Square
London, WC1H 9QU
United Kingdom

Jason Kuo

Georgetown University ( email )

3600 N St NW
Washington, DC 20057
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
652
Rank
653,722
PlumX Metrics