Selective Paternalism in Australian Social Security Law

Posted: 11 Dec 2018

See all articles by Liesel Spencer

Liesel Spencer

Western Sydney University, School of Law

Date Written: 2017

Abstract

Changes to the regulation of consumer leases for people on welfare who use Centrepay deductions to make lease payments for household goods, are part of the federal government’s response to a 2016 review of small amount credit contract laws. The review and response do not propose expanding availability of no-interest loans as an alternative to small amount credit contract finance. In 2015, a Bill proposing to exclude consumer leases from Centrepay failed to pass, with opponents objecting to the Bill as paternalistic. Restrictions on consumer spending imposed since 2007 by income management legislation, however, have been supported as necessary paternalism. These conflicting approaches to the protection of people receiving social security benefits from self-harming consumer choices constitute selective paternalism, while failing to deliver financial autonomy and inclusion.

Keywords: Social Security, Income Management, Consumer Leases, Paternalism, Affordable Finance

JEL Classification: K19

Suggested Citation

Spencer, Liesel, Selective Paternalism in Australian Social Security Law (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3284920 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3284920

Liesel Spencer (Contact Author)

Western Sydney University, School of Law ( email )

Locked Bag 1797
Penrith, NSW 2751
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
180
PlumX Metrics