Corresponding Ideas in Corresponding Forms
Michigan Bar Journal Vol. 98, No. 8 (Forthcoming)
3 Pages Posted: 20 Nov 2018 Last revised: 31 Jul 2019
Date Written: November 18, 2018
Abstract
Many lawyers and law students neglect the role structure can play in crafting persuasive arguments. They instead primarily focus on finding the right content. This short essay suggests a different approach: first figure out the right structure, then it can actually be easier to find—and include—the right content.
Keywords: Persuasion, advocacy, structure, parallelism
JEL Classification: K10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Barry, Patrick James, Corresponding Ideas in Corresponding Forms (November 18, 2018). Michigan Bar Journal Vol. 98, No. 8 (Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3287175
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.