The Unnecessary Confusion in New Zealand's Appellate Jurisdictions
(2012) Otago L. Rev. 829.
Posted: 13 Dec 2018
Date Written: 2012
Abstract
The Supreme Court of New Zealand’s decision in Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Stitching Lodestar is the centrepiece of New Zealand’s complicated and confusing approach to appellate jurisdiction. This paper examines that approach, attempts to identify the reasons why it is confusing and lastly, suggests a potential path for reform and improvement.
Keywords: Administrative Law, Public Law, New Zealand
JEL Classification: K00, K23, K40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Rodriguez Ferrere, M. B., The Unnecessary Confusion in New Zealand's Appellate Jurisdictions (2012). (2012) Otago L. Rev. 829., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3288240
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.