Tenure Redux

12 Pages Posted: 27 Nov 2018 Last revised: 6 Mar 2020

See all articles by Jacqueline D. Lipton

Jacqueline D. Lipton

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

Date Written: November 26, 2018

Abstract

This essay is a reflection on some of the questions that arose during the author's tenure process that are likely pertinent to others on the tenure track today particularly with respect to questions about writing style in tenure pieces, and on whether early scholars should focus on general law reviews or specialty journals--depending on their areas of expertise--or a combination of both. It also reflects on choice of subject matter for tenure work, and whether some of that work may or may not stand the test of time, as well as on differences between the U.S. legal scholarship process and equivalent publication requirements in other countries.

Keywords: tenure, legal academia, promotion, specialty journal, law review

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Lipton, Jacqueline Deborah, Tenure Redux (November 26, 2018). 59 IDEA 181 (2018), U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-36, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3290647

Jacqueline Deborah Lipton (Contact Author)

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )

3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-383-3207 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
181
Abstract Views
775
Rank
303,313
PlumX Metrics