뉴노멀 시대 중국의 지역별 혁신전략과 한국의 대응방안 (China’s Regional Innovation Strategy in the New Normal Era and Implications for Korea)

318 Pages Posted: 14 Dec 2018

See all articles by Jihyun Jung

Jihyun Jung

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy

Sanghun Lee

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy

Suyeon No

Korea University

Jonghyuk Oh

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy

Jinhee Pak

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy

Hanna Lee

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy

Jaehee Choi

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy

Date Written: December 27, 2017

Abstract

Korean Abstract: 중국은 한국과 경제적 이해관계가 가장 크며, 기술추격 등을 통한 경쟁관계가 심화되고 있는 국가이기 때문에 중국의 혁신발전전략 추진은 우리에게 새로운 시장진출을 위한 협력기회의 확대인 동시에 한국의 비교우위 및 경쟁력 약화로 인한 진출기회 축소 위험의 가중이라는 양면성을 지닌다. 한편 베이징, 상하이, 선전 등과 같이 혁신발전 수준이 높은 지역은 시장환경이나 제도·절차 등이 비교적 투명하지만 글로벌 기업 등 우수한 기업간 경쟁이 치열하고, 쓰촨, 산시 등은 혁신수준이 상대적으로 낮지만 정부의 적극성 및 정책의지가 강하고 로컬 기업과의 비교우위를 통한 진출여력이 상대적으로 크다는 특징이 있어 중국과의 실질적인 혁신분야 협력에서는 선택과 집중이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구는 미래지향적인 혁신 분야에서 협력의 가능성과 성과를 제고하기 위하여 한국과의 혁신협력이 유망한 지역을 선별하고 해당 지역과의 세부 협력 분야 및 방안을 분석하였다. 우선 협력지역의 선별을 위해 현재의 혁신역량을 지역별로 비교·평가하였고, 미래의 혁신발전 가능성을 가늠하고자 지역별 혁신전략과 세부 정책을 분석하였다. 또한 혁신전략의 구조적 특징인 추진 메커니즘 분석을 통해 협력 유망지역을 중심으로 지역별 혁신발전전략의 특징을 분석하였으며, 이를 통해 한국의 대응방안 및 한·중 간 협력방안을 모색하였다.

English Abstract: As China is both Korea’s largest economic partner and increasingly a competitor for Korean businesses as it catches up in its technology level, China’s strategy for innovation development offers Korea increasing opportunities for cooperation to enter new markets. These opportunities also have the double-sided nature of increasing risk by reducing opportunities for entry due to weakened competitiveness. On the other hand, regions with high levels of innovative development such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen are relatively transparent in terms of their market environment, systems and procedures, but competition between global-level companies is fierce. In the case of Sichuan and Shaanxi, while these regions have relatively low levels of innovation, it will be necessary to select and concentrate in areas for practical innovation cooperation, when considering the government’s aggressive policies and determination to implement its policies in these regions, which will generate a relatively high entry capacity for Korean businesses through their comparative advantage against local companies. As such, this study selects regions where innovation cooperation with Korea is likely to be developed, and analyzes detailed cooperation fields and plans with the relevant regions in order to enhance the possibility and performance of cooperation in the future-oriented field of innovation. In order to identify promising areas for cooperation, we compare and evaluate the current innovation capacity by region and analyze regional innovation strategies and detailed policies to measure the possibility of future innovation development. In addition, by analyzing the mechanism of this innovation, which is a structural feature of the innovation strategy, we analyze the characteristics of the regional innovation development strategies centered on promising regions, through which we propose appropriate countermeasures by Korea and plans to further cooperation between Korea and China.

Note: Downloadable document is in Korean.

Keywords: China, Regional innovation strategy, New normal era

Suggested Citation

Jung, Jihyun and Lee, Sanghun and No, Suyeon and Oh, Jonghyuk and Pak, Jinhee and Lee, Hanna and Choi, Jaehee, 뉴노멀 시대 중국의 지역별 혁신전략과 한국의 대응방안 (China’s Regional Innovation Strategy in the New Normal Era and Implications for Korea) (December 27, 2017). KIEP Research Paper. Policy Analyses 17-21, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3299867 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3299867

Jihyun Jung (Contact Author)

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy ( email )

[30147] Building C, Sejong National Research Compl
Seoul, 370
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Sanghun Lee

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy ( email )

[30147] Building C, Sejong National Research Compl
Seoul, 370
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Suyeon No

Korea University ( email )

1 Anam-dong 5 ka
Seoul, 136-701
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Jonghyuk Oh

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy ( email )

Sejong
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Jinhee Pak

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy ( email )

Seoul 137-602

Hanna Lee

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy ( email )

[30147] Building C, Sejong National Research Compl
Seoul, 370
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Jaehee Choi

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy ( email )

[30147] Building C, Sejong National Research Compl
Seoul, 370
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
734
PlumX Metrics