MENAKAR PROFESIONALISME HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA PERSPEKTIF THE BANGALORE PRINCIPLES OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Atas Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Gubernur Jatim Terkait Keputusan Menaikan Upah Minimum Regional Perkara Nomor: 691/Pdt.G/2008/PN SBY. (MEASURING JUDGE's PROFESSIONALISM IN DECIDING CASE IN PERSPECTIVE OF BANGALORE PRINCIPLES OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT: A Study of Court Decision Number: 691/Pdt.G/2008/PN SBY Concerning the Act Against Law of East Java Governor Regarding Its Decision to Increase Regional Minimum Wage)

86 Pages Posted: 15 Jan 2019

See all articles by Cekli Setya Pratiwi

Cekli Setya Pratiwi

Muhammadiyah Malang University - Law Faculty; Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Thailand - The Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies

Date Written: December 15, 2018

Abstract

Indonesian Abstract: Penelitian ini menelaah secara mendalam hal-hal penting atas pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara No: 691/Pdt G/2008/PN Sby. yang menjadi pokok perdebatan antara Penggugat Intervensi dan Penggugat Asal (Tergugat Intervensi). Putusan ini adalah putusan perkara perdata mengenai gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Penguasa antara Penggugat ALIM MARKUS dkk. melawan Gubernur Jawa Timur terkait Surat Keputusan Nomor:188/403/KPTS/103/2008 tentang Penetapan Upah Minimum Kabupaten-Kota di Jawa Timur Tahun 2009. Pertanyaan yang ingin dijawab adalah sejauh mana hakim dalam memutus perkara tersebut telah sesuai dengan enam prilaku inti peradilan dalam the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct yaitu kenetralan, integritas, propriety, kesetaraan, kompetensi, dan kecermatan.

English Abstract: This study examined in depth the important matters at the judge's discretion in deciding the case No: 691/Pdt G/2008/PN Sby. which is the subject of debate between the Intervention Plaintiff and the Original Plaintiff (Intervention Defendant). This decision was a civil court decision regarding a lawsuit of the Plaintiffs ALIM MARKUS et al. versus the Governor of East Java on the act against the law regarding the issuing of Governor Decree Number: 188/403/KPTS/103/2008 concerning the Determination of the Minimum Wage of Regency-City in East Java in 2009. The question to be answered is to what extent the judge in deciding the case is in accordance with the six core behaviors of the judiciary in the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct, namely neutrality, integrity, propriety, equality, competence, and diligence.

Note: Downloadable document is in Indonesian.

Keywords: court decision, the act against law, governor decree, judicial conduct, the bangalore principles

JEL Classification: K

Suggested Citation

Pratiwi, Cekli Setya, MENAKAR PROFESIONALISME HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA PERSPEKTIF THE BANGALORE PRINCIPLES OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Atas Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Gubernur Jatim Terkait Keputusan Menaikan Upah Minimum Regional Perkara Nomor: 691/Pdt.G/2008/PN SBY. (MEASURING JUDGE's PROFESSIONALISM IN DECIDING CASE IN PERSPECTIVE OF BANGALORE PRINCIPLES OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT: A Study of Court Decision Number: 691/Pdt.G/2008/PN SBY Concerning the Act Against Law of East Java Governor Regarding Its Decision to Increase Regional Minimum Wage) (December 15, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3304119 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3304119

Cekli Setya Pratiwi (Contact Author)

Muhammadiyah Malang University - Law Faculty ( email )

Malang, East Java
Indonesia

HOME PAGE: http://umm.ac.id

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Thailand - The Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies ( email )

Salaya
Thailand

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
287
Abstract Views
1,164
Rank
193,764
PlumX Metrics