The Promise and Perils of Alternative Market-Based Finance: The Case of P2P Lending in the UK

Journal of Banking Regulation (Forthcoming)

24 Pages Posted: 11 Jan 2019 Last revised: 25 Sep 2019

See all articles by Vincenzo Bavoso

Vincenzo Bavoso

The University of Manchester - School of Law

Date Written: January 2, 2019

Abstract

The collapse of the global financial industry in 2008 and the subsequent decay of most Western economies into a period of prolonged economic stagnation have represented a springboard for the progressive growth of alternative channels of financial intermediation. The reluctance and inability of mainstream banks in the post-crisis years to provide credit facilities to the real economy, most critically to start-ups and small and medium-sized enterprises, propelled the latest wave of financial innovation, this time under the guise of FinTech. Much has been written about the rise of FinTech in recent years, but there is still insufficient clarity about the benefits that this phenomenon is bringing to the real economy and the potential risks that can arise from its growth.

This paper maps the development of FinTech platforms in the UK and reconceptualises the the rationale for their growth. In doing that, this study focuses on the structure and operation of the main UK platforms, recognising that while some are effectively banks that adopt a different, technology-based business model, many platforms operate under the P2P business model. The question then is to assess the policy and regulatory approach that is relevant to UK P2P platforms. In doing that, this paper takes a critical look into the activities conducted by these platforms with the aim to clarify their specific business model and its associated risks. In particular, the emergence of P2P securitisation raises a number of regulatory and policy questions, because longer intermediation chains typical of securitisation may well defy the social and economic purposes under which the idea of P2P developed. Furthermore, questions of systemic risk inevitably resurface in these types of transactions. Ensuing questions related to the best way to regulate these new channels of financial intermediation lead to critically evaluate the initiatives launched by the UK FCA, initially under the Innovation Hub, and more recently under the consultation for a new regulatory framework.

Keywords: P2P Platforms; Financial Intermediation; Market-Based Finance; P2P Securitisation; Financial Conduct Authority

Suggested Citation

Bavoso, Vincenzo, The Promise and Perils of Alternative Market-Based Finance: The Case of P2P Lending in the UK (January 2, 2019). Journal of Banking Regulation (Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3309098 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3309098

Vincenzo Bavoso (Contact Author)

The University of Manchester - School of Law ( email )

Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PL, M139PL
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
223
Abstract Views
999
Rank
248,431
PlumX Metrics